# Six Myths About Vaccination – And Why They’re Wrong

- Link: https://stayathomemum.com.au/wellbeing/body/six-myths-vaccination-theyre-wrong/
- Published: 2015-03-07T18:00:42+11:00
- Author: theconversation

By [Rachael Dunlop](http://theconversation.com/profiles/rachael-dunlop-4133)_, [University of Technology, Sydney](http://theconversation.com/institutions/university-of-technology-sydney)_

Recently released government figures show levels of childhood vaccination have fallen
to dangerously low levels in some areas of Australia, resulting in some corners 
of the media claiming re-ignition of “the vaccine debate”.

You can check how your postcode rates here.

Well, scientifically, there’s no debate. In combination with clean water and sanitation,
vaccines are one of the most effective public health measures ever introduced, saving
millions of lives every year.

Those who claim there is a “debate” will cite a series of canards designed to scare
people away from vaccinating, but, if you’re not familiar with their claims, you
could easily be convinced by anti-vaccine rhetoric.

So what is true and what is not?

Let’s address just a few of the common vaccine myths and explain why they’re wrong.

## 1. Vaccines cause autism

The myth that vaccines are somehow linked to autism is an unsinkable rubber duck.
Initiated in 1998 following the publication of the now notorious Lancet paper, (
not-a-Dr) Andrew Wakefield was the [first to suggest](http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/i-was-there-when-wakefield-dropped-his-bombshell-1882548.html)
that the measles mumps rubella (MMR) vaccine might be linked to autism.

What he didn’t reveal was that he had multiple conflicts of interest including that
he was being [paid](http://briandeer.com/wakefield/legal-aid.htm) by lawyers assembling
a class action against the manufacturers of MMR, and that he himself had submitted
an application for a [patent](http://briandeer.com/wakefield/vaccine-patent.htm)
for a single measles vaccine.

It eventually unravelled for Wakefield when the paper was [retracted](http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2897%2911096-0/abstract)
in 2010. He was [struck](http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2010/may/24/andrew-wakefield-struck-off-gmc)
from the medical register for behaviour classified as “dishonest, unethical and 
callous” and the British Medical Journal [accused](http://www.bmj.com/content/342/bmj.c5347)
him of deliberate fraud.

But once the idea was floated, scientists were compelled to investigate, particularly
when it stood to impact public health so dramatically. One of the most powerful 
pieces of [evidence](http://www.bmj.com/content/330/7491/558.2) to show that there
is no link between vaccines and autism comes from Japan where the MMR was replaced
with single vaccines mid-1993. Guess what happened? Autism continued to rise.

 We currently don’t know what causes autism. But we do know what doesn’t: vaccines.
Image from shutterstock.com

After this door closed, anti-vaxers shifted the blame to thiomersal, a mercury-containing
component (not be [confused](http://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/Concerns/Thimerosal/thimerosal_faqs.html)
with the scary type that accumulates in the body). Small amounts of thiomersal were
used as a preservative in some vaccines, but this never included MMR.

Thiomersal or ethyl-mercury was removed from all scheduled childhood vaccines in
2000, so if it were contributing to rising cases of autism, you would expect a dramatic
drop following its removal. Instead, like the MMR in Japan, the opposite happened,
and autism continues to rise.

Further evidence comes from a recently published exhaustive review examining 12,000
research articles covering eight different vaccines which also concluded there was
no link between vaccines and autism.

Yet the myth persists and probably for several reasons, one being that the time 
of diagnosis for autism coincides with kids receiving several vaccinations and also,
we currently don’t know what causes autism. But we do know what doesn’t, and that’s
vaccines.

## 2. Smallpox and polio have disappeared so there’s no need to vaccinate anymore

It’s precisely because of vaccines that diseases such as smallpox have disappeared.

India recently experienced [two years without](http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2013/03/images-of-india-beating-polio-two-years-without-a-new-case/274002/)
a single case of polio because of a concerted vaccination campaign.

Australia was [declared measles-free](http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2009/02/11/2487452.htm)
in 2005 by the World Health Organization (WHO) before we stopped being so vigilant
about vaccinating and outbreaks began to [reappear](http://www0.health.nsw.gov.au/news/2012/20120530_01.html).

The impact of vaccine complacency can be observed in the current measles [epidemic in Wales](http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/394160/Measles-epidemic-cases-soar-to-886-rising-by-78-in-just-five-days)
where there are now over 800 cases and one death, and many people presenting are
of the age who missed out on MMR vaccination following the Wakefield scare.

In many ways, vaccines are a victim of their own success, leading us to forget just
how debilitating preventable diseases can be not seeing kids in calipers or hospital
wards full of iron lungs means we forget just how serious these diseases can be.

## 3. More vaccinated people get the disease than the unvaccinated

Although this sounds counter-intuitive, it’s actually true, but it doesn’t mean 
that vaccines don’t work as anti-vaxers will conflate. Remember that no vaccine 
is 100% effective and vaccines are not a force field. So while it’s still possible
to get the disease you’ve been vaccinated against, disease severity and duration
will be reduced.

 Those who are vaccinated have fewer complications than people who aren’t. Image
from shutterstock.com

With pertussis (whooping cough), for example, severe [complications](http://www.cdc.gov/pertussis/about/complications.html)
such as pneumonia and encephalitis (brain inflammation) occur almost exclusively
in the unvaccinated.

So since the majority of the population is vaccinated, it follows that most people
who get a particular disease will be vaccinated, but critically, they will suffer
fewer complications and long-term effects than those who are completely unprotected.

## 4. My unvaccinated child should be of no concern to your vaccinated one

Vaccination is not just a personal issue, it’s a community responsibility, largely
because of a concept known as “community immunity”. This describes a level of vaccination
that prevents epidemics or outbreaks from taking hold and spreading.

Some people question the validity of this concept, sometimes referred to as [herd immunity](http://www.scilogs.com/epilogue/one-of-the-herd-2/),
but the impact of it breaking down can be easily observed in places where vaccination
levels fall dangerously low take the current measles [outbreak in Wales](http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/394160/Measles-epidemic-cases-soar-to-886-rising-by-78-in-just-five-days),
for example.

The other important factor about community immunity is it protects those who, for
whatever reason, can’t be vaccinated or are not fully vaccinated. This includes 
very young children, immunocompromised people (such as cancer sufferers) and elderly
people.

## 5. Vaccines contain toxins

A cursory search of Google for vaccine ingredients pulls up a mishmash of scary-
sounding ingredients that to the uninitiated can sound like “franken-science”.

Some of these claims are patently untrue (there is no anti-freeze in vaccines), 
or are simple scaremongering (aborted foetuses in the 1960s some [cells](http://www.atcc.org/products/all/CCL-171.aspx)
were extracted from a foetus to establish a cell line that is still used in labs
today). Some of the claimed chemicals (and remember everything is made of chemicals)
are present, but are at such low levels as to never reach toxicity.

 A pear has 600 times more formaldehyde than a vaccine. Image from shutterstock.
com

The simple thing to remember is the poison is in the dose in high enough doses even
[water can kill you](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_intoxication). And there’s
600 times more formaldehyde in a pear than a vaccine.

Also, if you ever read the claim that “vaccines are injected directly into the blood
stream” (they’re not), be sceptical of any other claims made.

## 6. Vaccines will overwhelm kids’ undeveloped immune systems

The concept of “[too many too soon](http://www.babycenter.com/404_can-getting-more-than-one-vaccination-at-once-overload-my-ch_11452.bc)”
was recently examined in a detailed analysis of the US childhood immunisation schedule
by The Institute of Medicine. Experts specifically looked for evidence that vaccination
was linked to “autoimmune diseases, asthma, hypersensitivity, seizures, child developmental
disorders, learning or developmental disorders, or attention deficit or disruptive
disorders”, including autism. The researchers confirmed that the [childhood vaccination schedule was safe](http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevensalzberg/2013/01/28/iom-finds-childhood-vaccine-schedule-safe-as-it-always-has-been/).

The amount of immune challenges that children fight every day (between 2,000 to 
6,000) in the environment is significantly greater than the number of antigens or
reactive particles in all their vaccinations combined (about 150 for the entire 
vaccination schedule).

So the next time you hear these myths about vaccination, hopefully you’ll have some
evidence up your sleeve to debunk them.

![The Conversation](https://i0.wp.com/counter.theconversation.edu.au/content/13556/
count.gif?resize=1%2C1&ssl=1)

This article was originally published on [The Conversation](http://theconversation.com)
�and republished with full permission.
 Read the [original article](http://theconversation.com/six-myths-about-vaccination-and-why-theyre-wrong-13556).

![author avatar](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/dcd0565bd2c72b35157b11f3d13240b58e07c274a6663f21e10554705d80fe0a?
s=300&d=mm&r=pg)

 theconversation

 The Conversation are committed to knowledge-based journalism. Academics and researchers
work with journalists to provide evidence-based, ethical and responsible information.

 [See Full Bio](https://stayathomemum.com.au/author/theconversation/) [  ](https://stayathomemum.com.au/author/theconversation/)
