# Johnson & Johnson To Pay $72m In Ovarian Cancer Death Linked To Baby Powder

- Link: https://stayathomemum.com.au/news-opinion/general/johnson-johnson-to-pay-72m-in-ovarian-cancer-death-linked-to-baby-powder/
- Published: 2016-02-24T13:00:40+11:00
- Author: Clare Whitfield

## _The face of bathrooms all over the world may�soon be totally changed after a Missouri jury awarded the family of a women who died from ovarian cancer a massive $72 million dollars._

The civil suit was levelled against household name Johnson & Johnson after the woman,
prior to her death, claimed that her cancer had been caused by using the company’s
baby powder and other products.

That woman was [Jackie Fox](http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/feb/24/johnson-johnson-72-millon-babuy-talcum-powder-ovarian-cancer?CMP=soc_567),
native or Birmingham, Alabama. Fox died from her illness in October of 2015, after
a two year fight. Her son Marvin Salter took over as the plaintiff, seeking justice
for his mother, who was a regular Johnson & Johnson user. Marvin said in the proceedings
that he remembered the talcum powder being a bathroom staple in the home for decades,
and he never thought anything of it being used by everyone:

“It just became second nature, like brushing your teeth,” he said. “It’s a household
name.”

In the trial it emerged that Fox had been using Johnson’s Baby Powder and the Shower
to Shower body powder as a feminine hygiene product for [more than 35 years](http://www.rightinginjustice.com/news/2016/02/23/jury-finds-johnson-johnson-liable-for-ovarian-cancer-death-linked-to-talcum-powder-72-million-verdict/).

The final verdict was served on Monday night at the end of a three-week trial and
almost five hours of deliberations from the jury. They found Johnson & Johnson guilty
of negligence, conspiracy and fraud. Mrs. Fox was ultimately awarded $10m in actual
damages in $62m in punitive damages.

The family’s attorney had this to say:

“Jacqueline Fox was an incredible lady whose life was cut far too short by the callous
decisions by the bosses at Johnson and Johnson. Inside J&J folks have known for 
decades, literally decades, that the talc contained in its products could cause 
cancer. Instead of warning customers, J&J executives made the deliberate decision
to hide the risk and keep on selling. The internal documents tell a horrifying and
infuriating story of corporate greed and indifference to human life. We are honored
to represent the family of Ms. Fox and to bring to light the misdeeds of this company.”

They also noted that they expected Johnson & Johnson would attempt to appeal the
verdict, but the case remained significant as it was the first time that the jury
had ordered Johnson & Johnson to pay damages for the cancer-causing claims.

[⌊Baby powder container with powder dispersing into the air against a black background⌉⌊Baby powder container with powder dispersing into the air against a black background⌉ ](https://i0.wp.com/stayathomemum.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/jjsalesofotc.jpg?quality=89&ssl=1)

## **Johnson & Johnson Under The Spotlight**

Now�this isn’t the first time that Johnson & Johnson has come under fire from both
heath and consumer groups over some possibly harmful ingredients in their product
line, including in their baby-targeted products.

A coalition of these groups, known as the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics, began pushing
Johnson & Johnson in May of 2009, urging them to remove these ingredients from their
products. It took three years of petitions, a reasonable amount of negative publicity
and even a widespread boycott threat before the company agreed. In 2015 they finally
removed�1,4-dioxane and formaldehyde, both of which are widely recognised as probable
human carcinogens.

However the recent suit alleges that Johnson & Johnson were�absolutely aware of 
the dangers of these ingredients, and of the ‘hygienic talc’ in their products, 
but choose not to give consumers warning.�Talc itself is a naturally occurring mineral,
but hygienic talc has been linked several times with ovarian cancer. One study even
found that in women examined the majority of their ovarian tumours were embedded
with particles of talc. The suit uncovered a September 1997 internal memo from a
Johnson & Johnson medical consultant that said the link between hygienic talc use
and ovarian cancer was similar to the link between smoking and cancer.

The response from Johnson & Johnson was that they were considering their next legal
move. A spokesperson said that the verdict “goes against decades of sound science
proving the safety of talc as a cosmetic ingredient in multiple products”.

[⌊Johnson  johnson to pay m in ovarian cancer death linked to baby powder | stay
at home mum⌉⌊Johnson  johnson to pay m in ovarian cancer death linked to baby powder
| stay at home mum⌉[

## **What Does This Mean For The�****Company?**

While the $72m in damages is unlikely to survive the appeal process in its whole(
the government is trying to stop enormous punitive damages cases) the case still
has ramifications, particularly for Johnson & Johnson. Experts believe the company
is in troubled waters, as the case has set an�interesting precedent at a time when
Johnson & Johnson are currently facing at least 1,200 still-pending lawsuits, with
more on the way.

However, if it really is true that Johnson & Johnson were aware of the inherent 
dangers of hygienic talc and chose not to act and warn their consumers, they deserve
everything that’s coming for them.

![author avatar](https://i0.wp.com/stayathomemum.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/
12/clare_whitfield_profile.webp?quality=80&ssl=1)

 Clare Whitfield Chief Editor

 Clare Whitfield is the Editor of Stay at Home Mum and a recognised voice in practical
home management for Australian families. Based in the northern suburbs of Sydney,
she balances editorial leadership with life as a stay at home mum to two school 
age children. Her background in home economics and more than a decade of experience
in recipe development, family budgeting, and household systems inform her work.

 [See Full Bio](https://stayathomemum.com.au/author/clare_whitfield/) [  ](https://stayathomemum.com.au/author/clare_whitfield/)
